Compare
GPT-4o mini vs Grok 4 1 Fast Non Reasoning
Pricing is only the shared seller matrix below. Best rates and catalog map are separate sections, so no chart is embedded in pricing. Open the calculator for the same workload on each side.
Model
GPT-4o mini
Best $0.150 in · $0.600 out
Context window 128K
Model
Grok 4 1 Fast Non Reasoning
Best $0.200 in · $0.500 out
Context window 131K
GPT-4o mini is 25% cheaper on input. Grok 4 1 Fast Non Reasoning is 16% cheaper on output. The best choice depends on your input/output ratio.
Pricing matrix
Shared sellers only. Each row is a host that lists both models. Dollar amounts are per 1M tokens. Lowest in each pair of columns is emphasized.
| Provider | GPT-4o mini in | GPT-4o mini out | Grok 4 1 Fast Non Reasoning in | Grok 4 1 Fast Non Reasoning out |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Azure | $0.150 | $0.600 | $0.200 | $0.500 |
| Github Copilot | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Gmi | $0.150 | $0.600 | N/A | N/A |
| OpenAI | $0.150 | $0.600 | N/A | N/A |
| Openrouter | $0.150 | $0.600 | N/A | N/A |
| Replicate | $0.150 | $0.600 | N/A | N/A |
| Vercel Ai Gateway | $0.150 | $0.600 | N/A | N/A |
| Xai | N/A | N/A | $0.200 | $0.500 |
Best listed rates (this pair)
Same "best row in current pricing" logic as model pages: a compact view of the lowest input and output we show for each side. This is not the seller matrix.
Catalog map · OpenAI · Xai
Each chart uses real catalog rows that include both list input and list output ($/1M). Larger green dots are the models on this comparison page; accent dots are other active models from that provider.
OpenAI · input vs output
Scatter chart: X = input $/M, Y = output $/M. This page's models are labeled on the green dots; hover others for detail.
One dot per catalog row that has both list prices. Green dots are labeled with the models on this page; hover any dot for name and prices. Upper-right means higher cost on both axes ($/1M).
Xai · input vs output
One dot per catalog row that has both list prices. Green dots are labeled with the models on this page; hover any dot for name and prices. Upper-right means higher cost on both axes ($/1M).
Specifications
Each column header is the full model name. Tint marks the favorable value where we compute a winner.
- Context window
- 128,000 tokens
- 131,072 tokens
- Max output tokens
- 16,384 tokens
- 131,072 tokens
- Vision
- Yes
- No
- Function calling
- Yes
- Yes
- Streaming
- Yes
- No
- Release date
- Jul 2024
- N/A
Cost calculator
Same requests, input tokens, and output tokens for both columns. Pick the provider row that matches how you buy.
When to pick which
Short takeaways: no cards, just the points. Validate with your own workloads.
Long-context tasks
Use Grok 4 1 Fast Non Reasoning. Its 131K context window handles large codebases and documents better than 128K.
High-volume text generation
Use Grok 4 1 Fast Non Reasoning. Output tokens are 16% cheaper, which compounds significantly at scale.
Long output (reports, code files)
Use Grok 4 1 Fast Non Reasoning. Its 131K max output limit reduces the need to split requests.
Frequently asked questions
More comparisons
Other popular head-to-head matchups.
- GPT-4o mini vs GPT-4o
GPT-4o mini 94% cheaper on output
- GPT-4o mini vs o3
GPT-4o mini 92% cheaper on output
- GPT-4o mini vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
GPT-4o mini 96% cheaper on output
- GPT-4o mini vs Gemini 2.0 Flash
Gemini 2.0 Flash 33% cheaper on output
- Grok 4 1 Fast Non Reasoning vs GPT-4o
Grok 4 1 Fast Non Reasoning 95% cheaper on output
- Grok 4 1 Fast Non Reasoning vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
Grok 4 1 Fast Non Reasoning 96% cheaper on output