Compare
Minimax M2 1 vs Phind Code Llama 34b Python
Pricing is only the shared seller matrix below. Best rates and catalog map are separate sections, so no chart is embedded in pricing. Open the calculator for the same workload on each side.
Minimax M2 1 is 66% cheaper on input. Phind Code Llama 34b Python is 24% cheaper on output. The best choice depends on your input/output ratio.
Pricing matrix
Shared sellers only. Each row is a host that lists both models. Dollar amounts are per 1M tokens. Lowest in each pair of columns is emphasized.
| Provider | Minimax M2 1 in | Minimax M2 1 out | Phind Code Llama 34b Python in | Phind Code Llama 34b Python out |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fireworks AI | N/A | N/A | $0.900 | $0.900 |
| Gmi | $0.300 | $1.20 | N/A | N/A |
| Minimax | $0.300 | $1.20 | N/A | N/A |
| Novita | $0.300 | $1.20 | N/A | N/A |
| Openrouter | $0.270 | $1.20 | N/A | N/A |
Best listed rates (this pair)
Same "best row in current pricing" logic as model pages: a compact view of the lowest input and output we show for each side. This is not the seller matrix.
Catalog map · Minimax · Meta
Each chart uses real catalog rows that include both list input and list output ($/1M). Larger green dots are the models on this comparison page; accent dots are other active models from that provider.
Minimax · input vs output
Scatter chart: X = input $/M, Y = output $/M. This page's models are labeled on the green dots; hover others for detail.
One dot per catalog row that has both list prices. Green dots are labeled with the models on this page; hover any dot for name and prices. Upper-right means higher cost on both axes ($/1M).
Meta · input vs output
One dot per catalog row that has both list prices. Green dots are labeled with the models on this page; hover any dot for name and prices. Upper-right means higher cost on both axes ($/1M).
Specifications
Each column header is the full model name. Tint marks the favorable value where we compute a winner.
- Context window
- 196,608 tokens
- 16,384 tokens
- Max output tokens
- 16,384 tokens
- 16,384 tokens
- Vision
- No
- No
- Function calling
- No
- No
- Streaming
- No
- No
- Release date
- N/A
- N/A
Cost calculator
Same requests, input tokens, and output tokens for both columns. Pick the provider row that matches how you buy.
When to pick which
Short takeaways: no cards, just the points. Validate with your own workloads.
Long-context tasks
Use Minimax M2 1. Its 196K context window handles large codebases and documents better than 16K.
High-volume text generation
Use Phind Code Llama 34b Python. Output tokens are 24% cheaper, which compounds significantly at scale.
Frequently asked questions
More comparisons
Other popular head-to-head matchups.
- Minimax M2 1 vs GPT-4o
Minimax M2 1 88% cheaper on output
- Minimax M2 1 vs GPT-4o mini
GPT-4o mini 50% cheaper on output
- Minimax M2 1 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
Minimax M2 1 92% cheaper on output
- Minimax M2 1 vs Gemini 2.0 Flash
Gemini 2.0 Flash 66% cheaper on output
- Phind Code Llama 34b Python vs Llama 3.1 70B
Compare pricing side by side
- Phind Code Llama 34b Python vs Llama 3.1 8B
Compare pricing side by side