LLM Cost

Compare

MiMo-V2-Flash vs Qianfan-OCR-Fast

Pricing is only the shared seller matrix below. Best rates and catalog map are separate sections, so no chart is embedded in pricing. Open the calculator for the same workload on each side.

Openrouter

Model

MiMo-V2-Flash

Tool calling

Best $0.100 in · $0.300 out

Context window 262K

Pricing
Baidu

Model

Qianfan-OCR-Fast

Image input

Best $0.680 in · $2.81 out

Context window 66K

Pricing

MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper across the board — 85% cheaper on input and 89% cheaper on output.

Estimate cost

Pricing matrix

Shared sellers only. Each row is a host that lists both models. Dollar amounts are per 1M tokens. Lowest in each pair of columns is emphasized.

ProviderMiMo-V2-Flash inMiMo-V2-Flash outQianfan-OCR-Fast inQianfan-OCR-Fast out
Novita$0.100$0.300N/AN/A
Openrouter$0.100$0.300$0.680$2.81

Best listed rates (this pair)

Same "best row in current pricing" logic as model pages: a compact view of the lowest input and output we show for each side. This is not the seller matrix.

Catalog map · Openrouter · Baidu

Each chart uses real catalog rows that include both list input and list output ($/1M). Larger green dots are the models on this comparison page; accent dots are other active models from that provider.

Openrouter · input vs output

Scatter chart: X = input $/M, Y = output $/M. This page's models are labeled on the green dots; hover others for detail.

ListedoutputUSD/1M

One dot per catalog row that has both list prices. Green dots are labeled with the models on this page; hover any dot for name and prices. Upper-right means higher cost on both axes ($/1M).

Baidu · input vs output

ListedoutputUSD/1M

One dot per catalog row that has both list prices. Green dots are labeled with the models on this page; hover any dot for name and prices. Upper-right means higher cost on both axes ($/1M).

Specifications

Each column header is the full model name. Tint marks the favorable value where we compute a winner.

Spec
MiMo-V2-Flash
Qianfan-OCR-Fast
Context window
262,144 tokens
65,536 tokens
Max output tokens
16,384 tokens
28,672 tokens
Vision
No
Yes
Function calling
Yes
No
Streaming
No
Yes
Release date
Dec 2025
Apr 2026

Cost calculator

Same requests, input tokens, and output tokens for both columns. Pick the provider row that matches how you buy.

MiMo-V2-Flash
Monthly
$75
Annual
$913
Qianfan-OCR-Fast
Monthly
$626
Annual
$7.6K
Save $551/month with MiMo-V2-Flash

When to pick which

Short takeaways: no cards, just the points. Validate with your own workloads.

  • Long-context tasks

    Use MiMo-V2-Flash. Its 262K context window handles large codebases and documents better than 65K.

  • High-volume text generation

    Use MiMo-V2-Flash. Output tokens are 89% cheaper, which compounds significantly at scale.

  • Long output (reports, code files)

    Use Qianfan-OCR-Fast. Its 28K max output limit reduces the need to split requests.

Frequently asked questions

MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper on both input and output tokens.

More comparisons

Other popular head-to-head matchups.