Compare

GPT-5.6 Luna vs Weaver (alpha)

Pricing is only the shared seller matrix below. Best rates and catalog map are separate sections, so no chart is embedded in pricing. Open the calculator for the same workload on each side.

OpenAI

Model

GPT-5.6 Luna

Image inputTool calling

Best $0.100 in · $0.600 out

Context window 1.1M

Pricing
Openrouter

Model

Weaver (alpha)

Best $0.500 in · $0.750 out

Context window 8K

Pricing

GPT-5.6 Luna is 60% cheaper on input. Weaver (alpha) is 37% cheaper on output. The best choice depends on your input/output ratio.

Pricing matrix

Shared sellers only. Each row is a host that lists both models. Dollar amounts are per 1M tokens. Lowest in each pair of columns is emphasized.

ProviderGPT-5.6 Luna inGPT-5.6 Luna outWeaver (alpha) inWeaver (alpha) out
Azure$0.200$1.20N/AN/A
OpenAI$0.200$1.20N/AN/A
Openrouter$0.100$0.600$0.500$0.750

Best listed rates (this pair)

Same "best row in current pricing" logic as model pages: a compact view of the lowest input and output we show for each side. This is not the seller matrix.

Catalog map · OpenAI · Openrouter

Each chart uses real catalog rows that include both list input and list output ($/1M). Larger green dots are the models on this comparison page; accent dots are other active models from that provider.

OpenAI · input vs output

Scatter chart: X = input $/M, Y = output $/M. This page's models are labeled on the green dots; hover others for detail.

ListedoutputUSD/1M

One dot per catalog row that has both list prices. Green dots are labeled with the models on this page; hover any dot for name and prices. Upper-right means higher cost on both axes ($/1M).

Openrouter · input vs output

ListedoutputUSD/1M

One dot per catalog row that has both list prices. Green dots are labeled with the models on this page; hover any dot for name and prices. Upper-right means higher cost on both axes ($/1M).

Specifications

Each column header is the full model name. Tint marks the favorable value where we compute a winner.

Spec
GPT-5.6 Luna
Weaver (alpha)
Context window
1,050,000 tokens
8,000 tokens
Max output tokens
128,000 tokens
2,000 tokens
Vision
Yes
No
Function calling
Yes
No
Streaming
Yes
No
Release date
Jul 2026
Aug 2023

Cost calculator

Same requests, input tokens, and output tokens for both columns. Pick the provider row that matches how you buy.

GPT-5.6 Luna
Monthly
$240
Annual
$2.9K
Weaver (alpha)
Monthly
$2.5K
Annual
$30.8K
Save $2.3K/month with GPT-5.6 Luna

When to pick which

Short takeaways: no cards, just the points. Validate with your own workloads.

  • Long-context tasks

    Use GPT-5.6 Luna. Its 1050K context window handles large codebases and documents better than 8K.

  • High-volume text generation

    Use Weaver (alpha). Output tokens are 37% cheaper, which compounds significantly at scale.

  • Long output (reports, code files)

    Use GPT-5.6 Luna. Its 128K max output limit reduces the need to split requests.

Frequently asked questions

GPT-5.6 Luna is cheaper on input tokens, while Weaver (alpha) is cheaper on output. The best choice depends on your input/output ratio.

More comparisons

Other popular head-to-head matchups.