Compare
GPT-5.2 vs Gpt Audio 1 5 2026 02 23
Pricing is only the shared seller matrix below. Best rates and catalog map are separate sections, so no chart is embedded in pricing. Open the calculator for the same workload on each side.
GPT-5.2 is 30% cheaper on input. Gpt Audio 1 5 2026 02 23 is 28% cheaper on output. The best choice depends on your input/output ratio.
Pricing matrix
Shared sellers only. Each row is a host that lists both models. Dollar amounts are per 1M tokens. Lowest in each pair of columns is emphasized.
| Provider | GPT-5.2 in | GPT-5.2 out | Gpt Audio 1 5 2026 02 23 in | Gpt Audio 1 5 2026 02 23 out |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Azure | $1.75 | $14.00 | $2.50 | $10.00 |
| Github Copilot | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Gmi | $1.75 | $14.00 | N/A | N/A |
| OpenAI | $1.75 | $14.00 | N/A | N/A |
| Openrouter | $1.75 | $14.00 | N/A | N/A |
Best listed rates (this pair)
Same "best row in current pricing" logic as model pages: a compact view of the lowest input and output we show for each side. This is not the seller matrix.
Catalog map · OpenAI
Each chart uses real catalog rows that include both list input and list output ($/1M). Larger green dots are the models on this comparison page; accent dots are other active models from that provider.
OpenAI · input vs output
Scatter chart: X = input $/M, Y = output $/M. This page's models are labeled on the green dots; hover others for detail.
One dot per catalog row that has both list prices. Green dots are labeled with the models on this page; hover any dot for name and prices. Upper-right means higher cost on both axes ($/1M).
Specifications
Each column header is the full model name. Tint marks the favorable value where we compute a winner.
- Context window
- 272,000 tokens
- 128,000 tokens
- Max output tokens
- 128,000 tokens
- 16,384 tokens
- Vision
- Yes
- No
- Function calling
- Yes
- Yes
- Streaming
- No
- No
- Release date
- Dec 2025
- N/A
Cost calculator
Same requests, input tokens, and output tokens for both columns. Pick the provider row that matches how you buy.
When to pick which
Short takeaways: no cards, just the points. Validate with your own workloads.
Long-context tasks
Use GPT-5.2. Its 272K context window handles large codebases and documents better than 128K.
High-volume text generation
Use Gpt Audio 1 5 2026 02 23. Output tokens are 28% cheaper, which compounds significantly at scale.
Long output (reports, code files)
Use GPT-5.2. Its 128K max output limit reduces the need to split requests.
Frequently asked questions
More comparisons
Other popular head-to-head matchups.
- GPT-5.2 vs GPT-4o
GPT-4o 28% cheaper on output
- GPT-5.2 vs GPT-4o mini
GPT-4o mini 95% cheaper on output
- GPT-5.2 vs o3
o3 42% cheaper on output
- GPT-5.2 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
GPT-5.2 6% cheaper on output
- Gpt Audio 1 5 2026 02 23 vs GPT-4o
Compare pricing side by side
- Gpt Audio 1 5 2026 02 23 vs GPT-4o mini
Compare pricing side by side