Compare

Glm 4p5v vs Glm 5p1

Pricing is only the shared seller matrix below. Best rates and catalog map are separate sections, so no chart is embedded in pricing. Open the calculator for the same workload on each side.

Z Ai

Model

Glm 4p5v

Best $1.20 in · $1.20 out

Context window 131K

Pricing
Z Ai

Model

Glm 5p1

Best $1.40 in · $4.40 out

Context window 203K

Pricing

Glm 4p5v is cheaper across the board — 14% cheaper on input and 72% cheaper on output.

Pricing matrix

Shared sellers only. Each row is a host that lists both models. Dollar amounts are per 1M tokens. Lowest in each pair of columns is emphasized.

ProviderGlm 4p5v inGlm 4p5v outGlm 5p1 inGlm 5p1 out
Fireworks AI$1.20$1.20$1.40$4.40

Best listed rates (this pair)

Same "best row in current pricing" logic as model pages: a compact view of the lowest input and output we show for each side. This is not the seller matrix.

Catalog map · Z Ai

Each chart uses real catalog rows that include both list input and list output ($/1M). Larger green dots are the models on this comparison page; accent dots are other active models from that provider.

Z Ai · input vs output

Scatter chart: X = input $/M, Y = output $/M. This page's models are labeled on the green dots; hover others for detail.

ListedoutputUSD/1M

One dot per catalog row that has both list prices. Green dots are labeled with the models on this page; hover any dot for name and prices. Upper-right means higher cost on both axes ($/1M).

Specifications

Each column header is the full model name. Tint marks the favorable value where we compute a winner.

Spec
Glm 4p5v
Glm 5p1
Context window
131,072 tokens
202,800 tokens
Max output tokens
131,072 tokens
202,800 tokens
Vision
No
No
Function calling
No
No
Streaming
No
No
Release date
N/A
N/A

Cost calculator

Same requests, input tokens, and output tokens for both columns. Pick the provider row that matches how you buy.

Glm 4p5v
Monthly
$540
Annual
$6.6K
Glm 5p1
Monthly
$1.1K
Annual
$13.1K
Save $540/month with Glm 4p5v

When to pick which

Short takeaways: no cards, just the points. Validate with your own workloads.

  • Long-context tasks

    Use Glm 5p1. Its 202K context window handles large codebases and documents better than 131K.

  • High-volume text generation

    Use Glm 4p5v. Output tokens are 72% cheaper, which compounds significantly at scale.

  • Long output (reports, code files)

    Use Glm 5p1. Its 202K max output limit reduces the need to split requests.

Frequently asked questions

Glm 4p5v is cheaper on both input and output tokens.

More comparisons

Other popular head-to-head matchups.