Can I run GLM 4.7 Flash or Qwen3 1p7b cheaper on another provider?

Some models are available on inference providers like Together AI, Groq, and Fireworks AI at lower prices. Check each model's pricing page for the full provider comparison.

What is the context window difference between GLM 4.7 Flash and Qwen3 1p7b?

GLM 4.7 Flash has a larger context window at 200K tokens vs 131K. This matters for long documents, large codebases, and extended conversation histories.

Compare

GLM 4.7 Flash vs Qwen3 1p7b

Pricing is only the shared seller matrix below. Best rates and catalog map are separate sections, so no chart is embedded in pricing. Open the calculator for the same workload on each side.

Z Ai

Model

GLM 4.7 Flash

Image inputTool calling

Best $0.070 in · $0.400 out

Context window 200K

Pricing

AlibabaQwen

Model

Qwen3 1p7b

Best $0.100 in · $0.100 out

Context window 131K

Pricing

GLM 4.7 Flash is 30% cheaper on input. Qwen3 1p7b is 75% cheaper on output. The best choice depends on your input/output ratio.

Estimate cost

Pricing matrix

Shared sellers only. Each row is a host that lists both models. Dollar amounts are per 1M tokens. Lowest in each pair of columns is emphasized.

Provider	GLM 4.7 Flash in	GLM 4.7 Flash out	Qwen3 1p7b in	Qwen3 1p7b out
Fireworks AI	N/A	N/A	$0.100	$0.100
Openrouter	$0.070	$0.400	N/A	N/A

Best listed rates (this pair)

Same "best row in current pricing" logic as model pages: a compact view of the lowest input and output we show for each side. This is not the seller matrix.

Catalog map · Z Ai · Alibaba

Each chart uses real catalog rows that include both list input and list output ($/1M). Larger green dots are the models on this comparison page; accent dots are other active models from that provider.

Z Ai · input vs output

Scatter chart: X = input $/M, Y = output $/M. This page's models are labeled on the green dots; hover others for detail.

ListedoutputUSD/1M

One dot per catalog row that has both list prices. Green dots are labeled with the models on this page; hover any dot for name and prices. Upper-right means higher cost on both axes ($/1M).

Alibaba · input vs output

ListedoutputUSD/1M

One dot per catalog row that has both list prices. Green dots are labeled with the models on this page; hover any dot for name and prices. Upper-right means higher cost on both axes ($/1M).

Specifications

Each column header is the full model name. Tint marks the favorable value where we compute a winner.

Spec

GLM 4.7 Flash

Qwen3 1p7b

Context window: 200,000 tokens; 131,072 tokens
Max output tokens: 32,000 tokens; 131,072 tokens
Vision: Yes; No
Function calling: Yes; No
Streaming: No; No
Release date: Jan 2026; N/A

Cost calculator

Same requests, input tokens, and output tokens for both columns. Pick the provider row that matches how you buy.

GLM 4.7 Flash

Qwen3 1p7b

Requests / day

Input tokens

Output tokens

GLM 4.7 Flash

Monthly

$81

Annual

$986

Qwen3 1p7b

Monthly

$45

Annual

$548

Save $36/month with Qwen3 1p7b

When to pick which

Short takeaways: no cards, just the points. Validate with your own workloads.

Long-context tasks
Use GLM 4.7 Flash. Its 200K context window handles large codebases and documents better than 131K.
High-volume text generation
Use Qwen3 1p7b. Output tokens are 75% cheaper, which compounds significantly at scale.
Long output (reports, code files)
Use Qwen3 1p7b. Its 131K max output limit reduces the need to split requests.

Frequently asked questions

GLM 4.7 Flash is cheaper on input tokens, while Qwen3 1p7b is cheaper on output. The best choice depends on your input/output ratio.

More comparisons

Other popular head-to-head matchups.