Compare
Ft Babbage 002 vs o1
Pricing is only the shared seller matrix below. Best rates and catalog map are separate sections, so no chart is embedded in pricing. Open the calculator for the same workload on each side.
Ft Babbage 002 is cheaper across the board — 89% cheaper on input and 97% cheaper on output.
Pricing matrix
Shared sellers only. Each row is a host that lists both models. Dollar amounts are per 1M tokens. Lowest in each pair of columns is emphasized.
| Provider | Ft Babbage 002 in | Ft Babbage 002 out | o1 in | o1 out |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Azure | N/A | N/A | $15.00 | $60.00 |
| OpenAI | N/A | N/A | $15.00 | $60.00 |
| Openrouter | N/A | N/A | $15.00 | $60.00 |
| Replicate | N/A | N/A | $15.00 | $60.00 |
| Text Completion Openai | $1.60 | $1.60 | N/A | N/A |
| Vercel Ai Gateway | N/A | N/A | $15.00 | $60.00 |
Best listed rates (this pair)
Same "best row in current pricing" logic as model pages: a compact view of the lowest input and output we show for each side. This is not the seller matrix.
Catalog map · Other · OpenAI
Each chart uses real catalog rows that include both list input and list output ($/1M). Larger green dots are the models on this comparison page; accent dots are other active models from that provider.
Other · input vs output
Scatter chart: X = input $/M, Y = output $/M. This page's models are labeled on the green dots; hover others for detail.
One dot per catalog row that has both list prices. Green dots are labeled with the models on this page; hover any dot for name and prices. Upper-right means higher cost on both axes ($/1M).
OpenAI · input vs output
One dot per catalog row that has both list prices. Green dots are labeled with the models on this page; hover any dot for name and prices. Upper-right means higher cost on both axes ($/1M).
Specifications
Each column header is the full model name. Tint marks the favorable value where we compute a winner.
- Context window
- 16,384 tokens
- 200,000 tokens
- Max output tokens
- 4,096 tokens
- 100,000 tokens
- Vision
- No
- Yes
- Function calling
- No
- Yes
- Streaming
- No
- No
- Release date
- N/A
- Dec 2024
Cost calculator
Same requests, input tokens, and output tokens for both columns. Pick the provider row that matches how you buy.
When to pick which
Short takeaways: no cards, just the points. Validate with your own workloads.
Long-context tasks
Use o1. Its 200K context window handles large codebases and documents better than 16K.
High-volume text generation
Use Ft Babbage 002. Output tokens are 97% cheaper, which compounds significantly at scale.
Long output (reports, code files)
Use o1. Its 100K max output limit reduces the need to split requests.
Frequently asked questions
More comparisons
Other popular head-to-head matchups.
- Ft Babbage 002 vs GPT-4o
Compare pricing side by side
- Ft Babbage 002 vs GPT-4o mini
Compare pricing side by side
- Ft Babbage 002 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
Compare pricing side by side
- Ft Babbage 002 vs Gemini 2.0 Flash
Compare pricing side by side
- o1 vs GPT-4o
GPT-4o 83% cheaper on output
- o1 vs GPT-4o mini
GPT-4o mini 99% cheaper on output