Can I run Firefunction or Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 cheaper on another provider?

Some models are available on inference providers like Together AI, Groq, and Fireworks AI at lower prices. Check each model's pricing page for the full provider comparison.

What is the context window difference between Firefunction and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15?

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 has a larger context window at 1000K tokens vs 8K. This matters for long documents, large codebases, and extended conversation histories.

Compare

Firefunction vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15

Pricing is only the shared seller matrix below. Best rates and catalog map are separate sections, so no chart is embedded in pricing. Open the calculator for the same workload on each side.

Fireworks Ai

Model

Firefunction

Tool calling

Best $0.900 in · $0.900 out

Context window 8K

Pricing

AlibabaQwen

Model

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15

Image inputTool calling

Best $0.400 in · $2.40 out

Context window 1.0M

Pricing

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 is 55% cheaper on input. Firefunction is 62% cheaper on output. The best choice depends on your input/output ratio.

Estimate cost

Pricing matrix

Shared sellers only. Each row is a host that lists both models. Dollar amounts are per 1M tokens. Lowest in each pair of columns is emphasized.

Provider	Firefunction in	Firefunction out	Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 in	Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 out
Fireworks AI	$0.900	$0.900	N/A	N/A
Openrouter	N/A	N/A	$0.400	$2.40

Best listed rates (this pair)

Same "best row in current pricing" logic as model pages: a compact view of the lowest input and output we show for each side. This is not the seller matrix.

Catalog map · Fireworks Ai · Alibaba

Each chart uses real catalog rows that include both list input and list output ($/1M). Larger green dots are the models on this comparison page; accent dots are other active models from that provider.

Fireworks Ai · input vs output

Scatter chart: X = input $/M, Y = output $/M. This page's models are labeled on the green dots; hover others for detail.

ListedoutputUSD/1M

One dot per catalog row that has both list prices. Green dots are labeled with the models on this page; hover any dot for name and prices. Upper-right means higher cost on both axes ($/1M).

Alibaba · input vs output

ListedoutputUSD/1M

One dot per catalog row that has both list prices. Green dots are labeled with the models on this page; hover any dot for name and prices. Upper-right means higher cost on both axes ($/1M).

Specifications

Each column header is the full model name. Tint marks the favorable value where we compute a winner.

Spec

Firefunction

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15

Context window: 8,192 tokens; 1,000,000 tokens
Max output tokens: 8,192 tokens; 65,536 tokens
Vision: No; Yes
Function calling: Yes; Yes
Streaming: No; No
Release date: N/A; Feb 2026

Cost calculator

Same requests, input tokens, and output tokens for both columns. Pick the provider row that matches how you buy.

Firefunction

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15

Requests / day

Input tokens

Output tokens

Firefunction

Monthly

$405

Annual

$4.9K

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15

Monthly

$480

Annual

$5.8K

Save $75/month with Firefunction

When to pick which

Short takeaways: no cards, just the points. Validate with your own workloads.

Long-context tasks
Use Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15. Its 1000K context window handles large codebases and documents better than 8K.
High-volume text generation
Use Firefunction. Output tokens are 62% cheaper, which compounds significantly at scale.
Long output (reports, code files)
Use Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15. Its 65K max output limit reduces the need to split requests.

Frequently asked questions

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 is cheaper on input tokens, while Firefunction is cheaper on output. The best choice depends on your input/output ratio.

More comparisons

Other popular head-to-head matchups.