Compare
DeepSeek V3 vs Qwen-Max
Pricing is only the shared seller matrix below. Best rates and catalog map are separate sections, so no chart is embedded in pricing. Open the calculator for the same workload on each side.
DeepSeek V3 is cheaper across the board — 73% cheaper on input and 89% cheaper on output.
Pricing matrix
Shared sellers only. Each row is a host that lists both models. Dollar amounts are per 1M tokens. Lowest in each pair of columns is emphasized.
| Provider | DeepSeek V3 in | DeepSeek V3 out | Qwen-Max in | Qwen-Max out |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alibaba Cloud | N/A | N/A | $1.60 | $6.40 |
| Azure | $1.14 | $4.56 | N/A | N/A |
| DeepInfra | $0.380 | $0.890 | N/A | N/A |
| Deepseek | $0.280 | $0.420 | N/A | N/A |
| Fireworks AI | $0.900 | $0.900 | N/A | N/A |
| Hyperbolic | $0.200 | $0.200 | N/A | N/A |
| Nebius | $0.500 | $1.50 | N/A | N/A |
| Novita | $0.400 | $1.30 | N/A | N/A |
| Openrouter | $0.140 | $0.280 | $1.04 | $4.16 |
| Replicate | $1.45 | $1.45 | N/A | N/A |
| Together AI | $1.25 | $1.25 | N/A | N/A |
| Vercel Ai Gateway | $0.900 | $0.900 | N/A | N/A |
Best listed rates (this pair)
Same "best row in current pricing" logic as model pages: a compact view of the lowest input and output we show for each side. This is not the seller matrix.
Catalog map · Deepseek · Alibaba
Each chart uses real catalog rows that include both list input and list output ($/1M). Larger green dots are the models on this comparison page; accent dots are other active models from that provider.
Deepseek · input vs output
Scatter chart: X = input $/M, Y = output $/M. This page's models are labeled on the green dots; hover others for detail.
One dot per catalog row that has both list prices. Green dots are labeled with the models on this page; hover any dot for name and prices. Upper-right means higher cost on both axes ($/1M).
Alibaba · input vs output
One dot per catalog row that has both list prices. Green dots are labeled with the models on this page; hover any dot for name and prices. Upper-right means higher cost on both axes ($/1M).
Specifications
Each column header is the full model name. Tint marks the favorable value where we compute a winner.
- Context window
- 131,072 tokens
- 30,720 tokens
- Max output tokens
- 8,192 tokens
- 8,192 tokens
- Vision
- No
- No
- Function calling
- Yes
- Yes
- Streaming
- No
- No
- Release date
- Dec 2024
- Feb 2025
Cost calculator
Same requests, input tokens, and output tokens for both columns. Pick the provider row that matches how you buy.
When to pick which
Short takeaways: no cards, just the points. Validate with your own workloads.
Long-context tasks
Use DeepSeek V3. Its 131K context window handles large codebases and documents better than 30K.
High-volume text generation
Use DeepSeek V3. Output tokens are 89% cheaper, which compounds significantly at scale.
Frequently asked questions
More comparisons
Other popular head-to-head matchups.
- DeepSeek V3 vs GPT-4o
DeepSeek V3 95% cheaper on output
- DeepSeek V3 vs GPT-4o mini
DeepSeek V3 30% cheaper on output
- DeepSeek V3 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
DeepSeek V3 97% cheaper on output
- DeepSeek V3 vs Gemini 2.0 Flash
Gemini 2.0 Flash 4% cheaper on output
- Qwen-Max vs GPT-4o
Compare pricing side by side
- Qwen-Max vs GPT-4o mini
Compare pricing side by side