Can I run Databricks Meta Llama 3 70b or Qwen3.5-Flash cheaper on another provider?

Some models are available on inference providers like Together AI, Groq, and Fireworks AI at lower prices. Check each model's pricing page for the full provider comparison.

What is the context window difference between Databricks Meta Llama 3 70b and Qwen3.5-Flash?

Qwen3.5-Flash has a larger context window at 1000K tokens vs 128K. This matters for long documents, large codebases, and extended conversation histories.

Compare

Databricks Meta Llama 3 70b vs Qwen3.5-Flash

Pricing is only the shared seller matrix below. Best rates and catalog map are separate sections, so no chart is embedded in pricing. Open the calculator for the same workload on each side.

MetaLlama 3

Model

Databricks Meta Llama 3 70b

Best $1.00 in · $3.00 out

Context window 128K

Pricing

AlibabaQwen

Model

Qwen3.5-Flash

Image inputTool calling

Best $0.100 in · $0.400 out

Context window 1.0M

Pricing

Qwen3.5-Flash is cheaper across the board — 90% cheaper on input and 86% cheaper on output.

Estimate cost

Pricing matrix

Shared sellers only. Each row is a host that lists both models. Dollar amounts are per 1M tokens. Lowest in each pair of columns is emphasized.

Provider	Databricks Meta Llama 3 70b in	Databricks Meta Llama 3 70b out	Qwen3.5-Flash in	Qwen3.5-Flash out
Databricks	$1.00	$3.00	N/A	N/A
Openrouter	N/A	N/A	$0.100	$0.400

Best listed rates (this pair)

Same "best row in current pricing" logic as model pages: a compact view of the lowest input and output we show for each side. This is not the seller matrix.

Catalog map · Meta · Alibaba

Each chart uses real catalog rows that include both list input and list output ($/1M). Larger green dots are the models on this comparison page; accent dots are other active models from that provider.

Meta · input vs output

Scatter chart: X = input $/M, Y = output $/M. This page's models are labeled on the green dots; hover others for detail.

ListedoutputUSD/1M

One dot per catalog row that has both list prices. Green dots are labeled with the models on this page; hover any dot for name and prices. Upper-right means higher cost on both axes ($/1M).

Alibaba · input vs output

ListedoutputUSD/1M

One dot per catalog row that has both list prices. Green dots are labeled with the models on this page; hover any dot for name and prices. Upper-right means higher cost on both axes ($/1M).

Specifications

Each column header is the full model name. Tint marks the favorable value where we compute a winner.

Spec

Databricks Meta Llama 3 70b

Qwen3.5-Flash

Context window: 128,000 tokens; 1,000,000 tokens
Max output tokens: 128,000 tokens; 65,536 tokens
Vision: No; Yes
Function calling: No; Yes
Streaming: No; No
Release date: N/A; Feb 2026

Cost calculator

Same requests, input tokens, and output tokens for both columns. Pick the provider row that matches how you buy.

Databricks Meta Llama 3 70b

Qwen3.5-Flash

Requests / day

Input tokens

Output tokens

Databricks Meta Llama 3 70b

Monthly

$750

Annual

$9.1K

Qwen3.5-Flash

Monthly

$90

Annual

$1.1K

Save $660/month with Qwen3.5-Flash

When to pick which

Short takeaways: no cards, just the points. Validate with your own workloads.

Long-context tasks
Use Qwen3.5-Flash. Its 1000K context window handles large codebases and documents better than 128K.
High-volume text generation
Use Qwen3.5-Flash. Output tokens are 86% cheaper, which compounds significantly at scale.
Long output (reports, code files)
Use Databricks Meta Llama 3 70b. Its 128K max output limit reduces the need to split requests.

Frequently asked questions

Qwen3.5-Flash is cheaper on both input and output tokens.

More comparisons

Other popular head-to-head matchups.