Compare

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Nova Lite 1.0

Pricing is only the shared seller matrix below. Best rates and catalog map are separate sections, so no chart is embedded in pricing. Open the calculator for the same workload on each side.

Anthropic

Model

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Image inputTool calling

Best $2.80 in · $8.50 out

Context window 200K

Pricing
Amazon

Model

Nova Lite 1.0

Image inputTool calling

Best $0.060 in · $0.240 out

Context window 300K

Pricing

Nova Lite 1.0 is cheaper across the board — 98% cheaper on input and 98% cheaper on output.

Pricing matrix

Shared sellers only. Each row is a host that lists both models. Dollar amounts are per 1M tokens. Lowest in each pair of columns is emphasized.

ProviderClaude Sonnet 4.6 inClaude Sonnet 4.6 outNova Lite 1.0 inNova Lite 1.0 out
AmazonN/AN/A$0.060$0.240
Anthropic$3.00$15.00N/AN/A
Aws Bedrock$3.00$15.00N/AN/A
Azure$3.00$15.00N/AN/A
Fireworks AI$2.90$9.00N/AN/A
Google Vertex$3.00$15.00N/AN/A
Openrouter$3.00$15.00$0.060$0.240
Together AI$2.80$8.50N/AN/A
Vercel Ai GatewayN/AN/A$0.060$0.240

Best listed rates (this pair)

Same "best row in current pricing" logic as model pages: a compact view of the lowest input and output we show for each side. This is not the seller matrix.

Catalog map · Anthropic · Amazon

Each chart uses real catalog rows that include both list input and list output ($/1M). Larger green dots are the models on this comparison page; accent dots are other active models from that provider.

Anthropic · input vs output

Scatter chart: X = input $/M, Y = output $/M. This page's models are labeled on the green dots; hover others for detail.

ListedoutputUSD/1M

One dot per catalog row that has both list prices. Green dots are labeled with the models on this page; hover any dot for name and prices. Upper-right means higher cost on both axes ($/1M).

Amazon · input vs output

ListedoutputUSD/1M

One dot per catalog row that has both list prices. Green dots are labeled with the models on this page; hover any dot for name and prices. Upper-right means higher cost on both axes ($/1M).

Specifications

Each column header is the full model name. Tint marks the favorable value where we compute a winner.

Spec
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Nova Lite 1.0
Context window
200,000 tokens
300,000 tokens
Max output tokens
8,192 tokens
10,000 tokens
Vision
Yes
Yes
Function calling
Yes
Yes
Streaming
Yes
No
Release date
Feb 2026
Dec 2024

Cost calculator

Same requests, input tokens, and output tokens for both columns. Pick the provider row that matches how you buy.

Claude Sonnet 4.6
Monthly
$3.1K
Annual
$38.3K
Nova Lite 1.0
Monthly
$54
Annual
$657
Save $3.1K/month with Nova Lite 1.0

When to pick which

Short takeaways: no cards, just the points. Validate with your own workloads.

  • Long-context tasks

    Use Nova Lite 1.0. Its 300K context window handles large codebases and documents better than 200K.

  • High-volume text generation

    Use Nova Lite 1.0. Output tokens are 98% cheaper, which compounds significantly at scale.

  • Long output (reports, code files)

    Use Nova Lite 1.0. Its 10K max output limit reduces the need to split requests.

Frequently asked questions

Nova Lite 1.0 is cheaper on both input and output tokens.

More comparisons

Other popular head-to-head matchups.